#CUBASE 7 VS SONAR X3 MAC OS#

Studio One has a new audio engine as well from the start that is.

Sonar does not have a new audio engine (yet!). PT11 is boasting a new audio engine though and it is meant to be way more efficient so let us see when the reviews start coming out. At least most other DAW's will still install and work under not the latest OS.

#CUBASE 7 VS SONAR X3 MAC OS#

On her current new Mac OS PT8 won't even work and she has to spend $700 now to get PT10 or PT11. I got MBox back on line but there is not even an upgrade path from PT8 to PT10. Ooops now the MBox does not work at all and PT8 definitely won't work. All was well until she upgraded her Mac operating system (to 10.7.5). My son's girlfriend recently bought a second hand MBox 2 Mini and a copy of PT8. So from PT10 it might be $300! (don't quote me on this) Let us say it is then, is it worth it? Just found something and it has been mentioned on line that upgrade costs are from $300 to $500 depending on what version you have. It won't be free folks! Avid are always charging high prices and I am sure this won't be an exception. What we have to find out now is how much to go from PT10 to PT11. I remember what Tom Oberheim said to me one day and that was you must not get hooked into or believe your own advertising! His ads at the time were saying it was the only analog synth worth having but as he said and we all knew there were others!

But they have to trumpet it now and make some money.

Sonar (and other DAW's) too have had these things for years.

Cubase 7 vs sonar x3